<p>This paper uses survey data over time to assess the durability of various types of public goods in shaping popular attitudes to democracy in Nigeria. It finds that, even under unfavorable conditions, political goods are more durable than previously thought and that mass preferences for democracy do not require an economic miracle.</p><p>Based on the analysis within this study, the authors conclude that:</p><ul><li>the delivery of political goods is not only central to the formation of mass opinion about democracy but also durable over time, at least in the medium term following regime transitions. However, most analysts are prone to argue that the initial appeal of political goods will be replaced by popular demands that democracy must deliver material development</li><li>following regime change, Nigerians expressed high expectations for the performance of democracy. But their hopes were never sustainable. Yet, even after five years of political transition, they still cite political goods (trustworthy leaders, political rights) in judging the quality of the democracy</li><li>over the same period, citizens begin to refer to the government’s performance at implementing economic policies (to create jobs, control inflation, and distribute incomes) in judging whether democracy is being attained.</li></ul><p>[adapted from authors]</p>